This intersects with trends toward increasing incivility in media overall (Sobieraj & Berry, 2011), but it is particularly important for science news. Economic pressures have led media editors prioritize sensational coverage that attracts audience attention (Bennett et al., 2007), leading to an increase in coverage of scientific conflicts in news (Chinn et al., 2020 Hart et al., 2020). Disagreement and incivility are increasingly public features of science communication (Dudo, 2015). Results reveal that disagreement and incivility can not only lead to less attention to and acceptance of particular science issues, but also broader mistrust of scientists and scientific methods. In this study, we investigate how civil and uncivil disagreement about non-politicized issues affects attention to science news, evaluations of research, and scientific trust. While previous work has explored effects on issue attitudes, it has not examined how disagreement and incivility in news coverage influence attention to and trust in science. Abstract Disagreement and incivility are increasingly common in science communication.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |